Subscribe to our newsletter
Copyright © 2025 lpcentre.com All Rights Reserved. London Premier Centre For Training Ltd Registered in England and Wales, Company Number: 13694538
version: 3.0.1
Subscribe to our newsletter
11/27/2025, 9:42:06 AM
The European Commission proposed delaying the enforcement of certain AI regulations, responding to backlash on its 'AI Act' from major tech firms and worries about Europe's competitiveness.
The 'Digital Omnibus' aims to extend the deadline for stricter EU rules on high-risk AI from August 2026 to December 2027, pending approval from EU member states.
In the short term, the UK may provide more freedom for AI entrepreneurs, creating compliance uncertainty for businesses.
Meanwhile, the EU has postponed the AI Act due to concerns that stringent regulations may hinder its competitiveness against the US and China, particularly as Trump is easing AI standards in the US.
The EU's AI Act: Delays & Effects for Sturdy Regulation
The substantial financial investment in AI is undermining Europe's dedication to digital privacy and robust tech regulation, causing delays in the EU's AI Act and the weakening of GDPR.
Former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi noted Europe’s lag behind the US and China in innovation and emerging technologies, a sentiment echoed by the EU's economy commissioner.
Moreover, the US is seeking to enhance its role in artificial intelligence by removing barriers to industry growth, as seen in the National Defence Authorisation Act (NDAA), which encourages the federal government to block state-level AI regulations.
In contrast to Europe and China, US AI regulations are currently minimal and may become even less rigorous. The NDAA may also restrict the Chinese drone manufacturer DJI from launching new products in the US market.
Donald Trump recently drafted an executive order related to AI regulation, while Congressional Republicans previously proposed a failed 10-year moratorium on state laws governing AI. The proposed additions to the act may encounter significant opposition, as over 200 state representatives and senators have publicly opposed the measure.
Nvidia & Meta's Prospects in a Competitive Market
Nvidia continues to demonstrate outstanding quarterly earnings, maintaining a record of strong sales despite concerns over a potential AI bubble and external factors like trade wars. The CEO reassures investors by emphasising the company's robust performance across all phases of AI.
Notably, Meta successfully overcame a significant antitrust lawsuit initiated by the US government, with the reasoning reflecting the judge's rationale in the US vs Google case. Both judges noted substantial changes in the technology industry since the trials commenced.
Likewise, meaningful competition has emerged between Google and Meta in the technology industry, particularly in search and social media. Google faces significant competition from ChatGPT and generative AI, which it has termed a “code red” for its business.
Despite the challenges, Sam Altman of OpenAI suggests that Google's AI advancements may only lead to temporary setbacks for his company.
Besides, Meta views TikTok as its main competitor, with Mark Zuckerberg labelling it a “highly urgent” threat. This sentiment was echoed by Judge James Boasberg, who noted TikTok's impact on the social networking landscape and criticised the FTC for overlooking YouTube as a competitor.
Consequently, Boasberg concluded that Meta would not need to divest Instagram or WhatsApp due to the increased competition.
Google's Market Share & Consequences
In September, a US judge ruled against Google in the case US vs Google, supporting the government's assertion of the company's illegal monopoly in online search, where it has about 90% market share globally. However, the judge did not accept the proposed remedy of forcing Google to divest its Chrome browser.
Subsequently, Google will retain Chrome, its valuable web browser, despite the competitive challenges posed by generative AI, which has made companies like OpenAI significant competitors.
